Difference between revisions of "Motel 6 Provided ICE with Guest Data"
(Created page with "{{Event}}") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Event}} | + | {{Event |
+ | |Laws and Regulations=Fourth Amendment | ||
+ | |Short Title=Motel 6 Provided ICE with Guest Data | ||
+ | |Location=USA, Washington State | ||
+ | |Date=April 2019 | ||
+ | |Taxonomy=Interrogation, Identification, Secondary Use, Breach of Confidentiality, Increased Accessibility, Intrusion, Disclosure | ||
+ | |Personal Information=Identifying, Ethnicity, Location, Contact | ||
+ | |Threat Actors=ICE, Regional | ||
+ | |Affected Individuals=Ethnic Minorities | ||
+ | |High Risk Groups=Hispanic Individuals, Latin Individuals | ||
+ | |Secondary Consequences=Incarceration, Deportation, Loss of Trust | ||
+ | |Summary=Motel 6 employees in Washington State handed ICE agents information of 80,000 guests without requesting a warrant. | ||
+ | |Description=For over two years Motel 6 employees would provide ICE agents with guest data such as names, date of birth, identification data, license plates, and room number without requesting a warrant. The ICE agents would then target Latin/ Hispanic minorities based on last names and hold them for questioning, detainment, and deportation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A multitude of concerns arises from this practice. Motel 6's [[Secondary Use]] of data, [[Breach of Confidentiality]], and [[Increased Accessibility]] of their guest data allowed ICE to [[Interrogation | Interrogate]], [[Identification | Identify]], and [[Intrusion | Intrude]] on the lives of many. Motel 6's disclosure of information without a warrant violated the company's privacy policy. To resolve the lawsuit that was filed against them they agreed to pay $12 million to those affected and have signed a legally binding document to stop volunteering guest information without a warrant present. However, that doesn't repair the damage that has already been done or the families that were torn. | ||
+ | |Sources=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/05/business/motel-6-ice-lawsuit.html | ||
+ | }} |
Latest revision as of 14:04, 29 April 2020
Motel 6 Provided ICE with Guest Data | |
---|---|
Short Title | Motel 6 Provided ICE with Guest Data |
Location | USA, Washington State |
Date | April 2019 |
Solove Harm | Interrogation, Identification, Secondary Use, Breach of Confidentiality, Increased Accessibility, Intrusion, Disclosure |
Information | Identifying, Ethnicity, Location, Contact |
Threat Actors | ICE, Regional |
Individuals | |
Affected | Ethnic Minorities |
High Risk Groups | Hispanic Individuals, Latin Individuals |
Tangible Harms | Incarceration, Deportation, Loss of Trust |
Motel 6 employees in Washington State handed ICE agents information of 80,000 guests without requesting a warrant.
Description
For over two years Motel 6 employees would provide ICE agents with guest data such as names, date of birth, identification data, license plates, and room number without requesting a warrant. The ICE agents would then target Latin/ Hispanic minorities based on last names and hold them for questioning, detainment, and deportation.
A multitude of concerns arises from this practice. Motel 6's Secondary Use of data, Breach of Confidentiality, and Increased Accessibility of their guest data allowed ICE to Interrogate, Identify, and Intrude on the lives of many. Motel 6's disclosure of information without a warrant violated the company's privacy policy. To resolve the lawsuit that was filed against them they agreed to pay $12 million to those affected and have signed a legally binding document to stop volunteering guest information without a warrant present. However, that doesn't repair the damage that has already been done or the families that were torn.
Laws and Regulations
Sources
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/05/business/motel-6-ice-lawsuit.html